Programme in development. Draft documents are not a basis for certification.Development stageProgramme status ↗
VRS explained

A credible claim states its boundary.

A useful claim says what was assessed, for whom, where and against which document version. It does not imply more than the evidence can support.

Illustrative visualisation; not evidence of a certified site.

Organisation versus product

A shop or organisation may have a defined assessed scope. That does not make every item, activity or affiliated company certified. The product's sourcing evidence must support any item-level statement.

Carbon calculations

RTX-501 distinguishes an operational footprint from estimated avoided emissions. Estimates depend on assumptions, allocation and comparison scenarios; they are not automatic proof of carbon neutrality.

Check before publishing

Compare wording with RTX-103, the approved scope and the supporting record. Avoid unsupported statements of regulatory approval, accreditation, guaranteed compliance or quantified environmental savings.

Examples of boundary-aware wording

The examples below illustrate the principle; the authorised wording will be defined by RTX-103 and the approved scope.

  • Name the organisation and the activity assessed, not the whole group
  • Refer to the document and version used for the assessment
  • State whether a claim concerns a shop, a batch or an individual item
  • Present carbon figures with their method and assumptions